The Sleeping Drummer; Upon Waking, Discovering The Alter Ego While Eclipsing The Trinary Super NovaGP duBerger (2010)
Public Domain
Some will die for their beliefs and some will kill for their beliefs but is there such a thing as a martyr or defender of Truth? Where does belief require such magnitudes of devotion where truth gets none, yet in court they make you swear by the truth before any deity. Theoretical physicist, Lawrence Krauss likes to tell the layman, on the lecture and conference circuit that 2 + 2 can make 5 if the quantity of 2 is "very large", such as 2.5 twice equals 5. The logic itself "reduces" the quality of the number 2 and emphasizes an unknown quantity and assumes we already know it by stating it only needs to be a "large quantity". This he cites, I quote: "Because sometimes, in physics, one must bend the rules".
This statement is totally contrary to Nature including quantum mechanics which is very strict concerning integers, and the Scientific method and in a mercenary form, oddly, this becomes an argument for atheism. Believers and atheists use the same arguments against each other and they are both vicious, so, in the end, they both deserve each other but it is information, itself, that is the thing that gets severely distorted to gain everyone's confidence which is why I regard them as equivalent and the same. Why I say "oddly" is because in a supposedly-progressive third millennium, philosophical debates are being handled by incompetents on either side of theism and science by stupid theorists and clever evangelists who say things contrary to Nature as a reference to criticize or promote disputes and as if there's supposed to be a conflict, rather than resolving issues in a civilized manner that themselves should not exist, or wouldn't if these things were handled by different types of individuals. By recognizing Nature as a reference they stupidly admit that Nature is better than god or no god or is important in the extreme where true faith should not be concerned with such matters in the first place. Anyway, I had a calendar on this website to remind me that I don't live in the middle ages or I'm in kindergarten and have come to realize, over time, that it is the calendar that is the actual illusion. The correct statement for such a idea; as if this were a question, would be: "What two specified quantities of 2 would it take to equal 5 (not make 5)? The correct answer: "None". This is especially true when one is introducing this concept to an unwary public. These clever theoretical physicists, who know absolutely nothing about Equivalency; present their conclusions through determinancy instead, and ludicrously think that this would be a Sufficient type of argument in such situations.
As a surrealist and not a Getting Soviet and American technology to work together to create the first space station.
The Apollo-Soyuz mission
One may as well say: One can feed himself with the bacteria and particulate matter in the air by merely breathing in and swallowing enough of it. It was while researching the history of Thermodynamics that I discovered all kinds of fun people who deliberately distort Nature and make money too! There seems to be an infinite pool of money available to anyone willing to distort science so that people will not properly understand it nor understand Nature. Real dollars can be earned by simply distributing mounds of inexpensively-made cow pies to describe Nature. Although this will be hard for me to prove but this article has nothing to do with the ideas of William A. Dembski, Leonard Susskind or Amit Goswami et al. (respectively, a religious fanatic, an atheist, a guru and others) nor does this have anything to do with the ideas of "Conservation of Information", "Religious Thermodynamics", "Intelligent Design", "Quantum Mysticism and other "good" businesses. This is about The Laws of Thermodynamics and 2 + 2 = 4 and that is the only thing I believe and nothing else.
I have imagination that gleans the sweetest fruit of today's marvellous discoveries and does his best to make it sensible and practical. Sometimes I "postulate" from my own "Quasi-Laboratory" and give myself great latitude. This is all conjecture and this is not to be confused with scientific proof nor is it to be considered science-fiction either. This is a manifesto that no one has endorsed and its most important feature is to put out real logical questions and not answers, derived from my appreciation and understanding of science and art. It entirely rejects the validity of creationism and associated ideas, both for and against, whose own reference source requires citation where, on the other hand nothing that exists in Nature can ever be disputed (except by crackpots). I offer an approach to all, or at least acknowledge this at their leisure by utilizing easily verifiable scientific discoveries and by using a most basic understanding of Thermodynamics. I blame cosmologists, philosophers, intellectuals and theoretical/particle physicists, some professors, (not applied physicists); for all ideas that don't make sense or claim that it is the science or observation itself that is "against normal expectations", which takes balls to say things like that about Nature; which depending how this idea is used, can mean lots of things since science demonstrations are not performances given by illusionists anyway, which are meant to be counterintuitive where people go see them exactly for that too and want to be fooled to achieve a sense of wonder. Scientists and professors cannot have it both ways; Either you are a magician/illusionist or you are a scientist and you discuss your subject using appropriate patter.
Our own dreams, when we sleep, and still being in a state of self-awareness, are quantum mechanical in their media format where we can jump from one place or another and we have no control over this universe either, and everything is symbolic and apparently this is quite natural, so what is this "contrary to expectations" and "counterintuitive" and what does this mean when we consider both the conscious and subconscious mind simultaneously? Inadvertently, — or not, Cosmologists and friends are driving people back to primitive tribal religions, especially with their unprovable fantasies and Harry Potter-like interpretations about time travel, fabrics, strings, dark matter, higgs bosons etc. etc. and their expert opinions on the origins of the Universe, whose ideas are so bizarre that religious simplicity is justifiably welcomed and endorsed by the popular imagination which is probably the plan all along because these people cannot deny that they were unaware of the implications of what they said nor gain any type of sympathy for any kind of answer that they could muster-up since they also tamper with history to alter the future, making lies out of both. Nothing they say has been confirmed or proven by peers in the applied sciences or by any mathematicians and everything they say has a covert political and corporate agenda behind it which can be proven, because that leaves a paper trail.
Travelling Salesman
The abroThis famous film demonstrates orders of magnitude
gation of the cosmo
logical principle is so flimsy, it could be debated at a family dinner table, using Classical Mechanics alone, and produce accuracy while discussing other things and eating dessert too. Since The Universe is not a Black Hole (the Universe, Itself, is beyond gravity but everything inside the Universe cannot escape gravity) it can shrink indefinitely with no limit without ever being crushed into a singularity, which is called 'Orders of Magnitude' and each order of magnitude is equivalent to the present Universe we know of with its own Relative vastness with-what exists there. Religious philosophers and cosmologists and the rest of them, arbitrarily put their finger in some magnitude, somewhere, and say this is where it starts, where even if they chose a point within any order of magnitude, this would distort the structure mathematically and would make our magnitude of existence here impossible. Forget 'time paradoxes', we have 'creationist paradoxes'; whether they be biblical or scientific, they are the same whereas the 6 day hypotheses has been changed to 1/6 orders of magnitude. These people in any sense you can think of, are equivalent to destroyers of any universe in any time frame, idea or construct which is betrayed by their paradoxical logic, yet they appear to us as prophets, seers and sages while not understanding their own hypocrisy and bigotry because they "Believe" and believing supposedly makes everything honorable and beyond reproach. Sorry, but believing isn't good enough in this Universe because if it were, we would not need science too to stay alive. In Quantum mechanics this is also true because that is exactly what they study which is what goes on between things and particles in any order of magnitude and they are particularly interested in what goes on between states where nothing supposedly exists because everything, quantum mechanically, is either here or there or both, or many places at once and in no instance are there smooth transitions between states. the exact same electron is either in one orbit or in an other orbit and does not ever exist in between like a planet could in a solar system, if moving from one orbit to another, if a cataclysm occurred. The only difference between Classical Mechanics and Quantum mechanics is: One looks at all the keys, key signatures and different chords, and the other looks at those dark mysterious places between those keys (known as intervals) or between two different chords and even between key signatures on any keyboard. In an area where both views of the Universe agree, is it a coincidence that is the precise spot that they split apart for their own purposes to fulfill the requirements of their own corrupt closed/isolated systems.
Nature's priests are supposed to be philosophers who fortunately have no power-base like ordinary priests do, so they are easy to ignore; but they have friends. They propose 11 or more dimensions (why not?) but do we ourselves, actually exist in 11D universally and would it not be more important to demonstrate this first with existing matter and has already proven itself to us and to everything else? The idea of beginning any theoretical postulate with "The theoretical existence of blah, blah..." becomes, by those two words that are underlined, an oxymoron when discussing anything, supposedly built by things that are not proven themselves to exist in relation to any physicality and yet they use these things to describe a physical universe: With/why fundamental things that, over the eons have not changed their characteristics over billion of years and by disregarding mountains of empirical data and making no effort to piece it together or find any patterns and harmonies, except as a venue to impose strategies based on systems which are all things that are prone to corruption, falsehoods and false spirituality. Further, they describe a physical universe and then invent things that are invisible and unproved and then use those things to dictate (not guide) how this universe works. Ultimately your own life is included in this scenario because this is a very convenient institutionalized fantasy that is used in many different businesses for the future of exploitation and manipulation and the opportunities they bring. One can only postulate a "theoretical existence" of things that are made from provable and fundamental things first. With their very convenient kind of application of logic, one can create any fanciful universe imaginable where we may as well go back to religious explanations and forget science as this is equivalent to an evangelist saying to his flock: "I think God meant to say.....". Of course this is probably what they want because, as I said in 'Extreme Cold' one can control anything with misinformation too. It is the type of control that is to be examined which makes this possible because control can, itself, create chaos if its designed to do this while being disguised as not doing this, which is another control device and so on.
As I wrote in my other article, Rhetoric, it is not the job of thinkers and intellectuals to tell you what Nature is because Nature can already do this and a healthy understanding of Thermodynamics will give anyone the tools to question an idea or judgment of any questionable theoretical-physicist, mystic or theologian who abound in epidemic proportions all over the internet and in all other medias, as anyone with a computer nowadays can come up with fanciful ideas and present them. Further the more faulty and damaging any idea is, the more likely the idea is going to get picked up, spread around and popularized. Everyone seeks some answers on matters of existence at one point of their lives, therefore it is important to understand that particle/theoretical physicists and cosmologists are not gurus or prophets of profound understanding just as much as theologians and evangelists are not either nor should their opinions hold sway over other 
These meanings have become blurred in language, mathematics and logic. If one looks at the word Chaos, for example, one is now led to a complete directory of chaos-this and chaos-that, as if it only, now, exists as a double noun or a noun and an adverb etc., rather than a single word definition. For instance, string theory, for obvious reasons, does not handle simple angular momentum (spin) of particles very effectively and further a lot of this stuff is devised, developed, written and marketed by creepy people you would never even invite for coffee anywhere. Have you ever met Lee Smolin of the Perimeter Institute? Very Creepy and he's not the only one. The 2nd illustration before this one, (click to magnify or if you prefer the actual page, click here) [the page has changed but the B.S. formula is still there intact] is to show the ordinary person that this is the way a simple question is, now, explained which of course is not adequate because a non-abstract question should get a non-abstract answer or at best, should be based on some mathematical proofs or at least, they should be included informally somewhere including their explanations. In the screenshot above, one will find circled with question mark symbols, my contribution to this formula that should be considered as addition that were left out by this pompous ass, in that this egghead expects the simple layman, with a legitimate and intelligent question, to automatically understand this theoretical formula without any explanations. Strings, or superstrings are contrary to quantum mechanics by the very act of taking away disembodiment and giving it a defined structure with surface areas and so on, in a classical mechanical fashion and use a sophist argument; "Just because you can't see it, does not mean that it's not there". Men that hide behind mathematically garrulous hyperboles are like the men who hid behind their mothers or wives skirts.
This shows everyone quite clearly, that by taking the question seriously and then by attempting to answer it, this question was far more intelligent and legitimate than the answer. The question was clear and expounded its own simple and concrete ideas using universal things and the expert's answer expresses nothing by not attempting to form any relationship to those simple things that created the question. From our perspective and even from the Principles of The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics, we see that it is the question that produced actual results,— not the answer! Even a scientist would expect this formula to be explained as to its relationships with the exact meanings of those symbols because those symbols mean different things elsewhere — even within the same study. A mathematical formula without integers, only indicates a function or idea and is never to be used as an explanation, especially to outsiders. This thing could also be your grandmother's secret recipe for pound cake written in shorthand.
One cannot even copy and paste those symbols to an address or search bar to study, deconstruct, research or verify them because they are either; images or a form of JavaScript like MathJax. One cannot even type them out manually because these symbols don't exist on any keyboard. To make them yourself you'd use an Equation Editor and then try to find some obscure search engine somewhere to locate their meaning. If the answer is too long, or has different approaches to it, then one should, politely, provide a reference, or point to a specific point in a mathematics library somewhere of where any detailed explanation could be obtained or provide answers in places that are more amenable to verification. This would be a proper answer and as well, it would create a viable communication between inquiring minds and experts. A certified genius like the Professor Emeritus of Physics at MIT, Daniel Kleppner who actually invented things and made amazing discoveries knows how to explain things in ways anybody can understand, where in this illustration he explains how individual atoms start acting when they become Bose-Einstein condensates. The most complicated symbols, here, are 'Squiggles' which he manipulates to show what happens to us Earther's, very effectively, without the need to use fancy specialized mathematics including ideas that are only confined to closed or isolated systems. From the point of view of artistic philosophy, this man understands and utilizes Open systems which is what makes him the genius he is and if you "see" the same, 'No Fences or Boxes' logic, then you should consider yourself, too, a very intelligent person.
This shows that the idiot who 'wrote' the above-demonstrated formula, actually is a picture where he meticulously copied and pasted things, with something like a Microsoft paint dauber would do, but called it science or math. There is no form of JavaScript that can be pasted on any thread or similarly-to-email text or comment box that can create these kind of things. Art, like math and science is not supposed to be used to abuse other things but then again, as I said before, these types are not aware of their own hypocrisy, which is the founding architecture of/to/for any kind of delusion and the guy probably thinks he's providing a valuable service. The fact that a place like 'Physics Stack Exchange' allows people to post pictures inside the comment boxes, shows that the entire site probably has an ulterior agenda or a different purpose to what they claim it is for. Since I have a website (the one your on now) I know what it takes to make any kind of HTML element on any page including the different types of servers that provide different forms of information in different ways, or, I have a pretty good idea what it is and what I don't know, I know where to find it, so I am speaking with a tiny bit of authority here.
On the more speculative front, The Laws of Thermodynamics are not used to explain, for example, where Entropic heat energy is going in this Universe if there exists a flow or if it is static phenomena in an open system like the universe (some prefer to think the Universe as an Isolated system, even though there can never be any form of entropy in any kind of isolated system, — to each his own). The knowledge that the Universe is expanding and accelerating, which suggests, very strongly, that energy also moves already within that function, at least in certain ways. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that the Universe may also have a kind of angular momentum were most of it (not all) has been transferred to itself in smaller and smaller packets of angular momentum that when added back together again, contains the complete angular Momentum of the Universe. Scientists believe that the Universe, itself, has no angular momentum nor do they consider that, at such magnitudes, angular momentum may appear quite differently but it is still angular momentum just like gravity takes the form of a circle or ellipse at small magnitudes and then, spirals at greater magnitudes and clusters in much larger magnitudes. so, like gravity, angular momentum would take on different forms at different magnitudes which does not mean it does not exist but the math involved is very different. Ask yourself: What shape can exist beyond a cluster in this type of physics of gravity?
This is OK if you think about singularities all the time and worry where information goes in a black hole which is an entirely irrelevant situation because information in a black hole doesn't belong to us anyway, nor does it concern us, so why should we care. It's unlikely anything concerning those ideas will be proven or disproven conclusively for a very long time, if ever, as no experiments involving the magnitudes of mass necessary could be reproduced locally, or in this neck of the universe nor could anyone be expected to survive this type of phenomena and write a paper about it later or be expected to interpret reality the same way as before if the person did survive. Information as per quantum mechanics is not interested in 0 ands 1's; it is interested in what goes on between those zeros and ones. The real idiot is Leonard Susskind not Stephen Hawking in this debate about information for engaging Hawking on this subject in the first place. They're both wrong but in principle, Hawking is correct in terms that can be understood when I discussed the Caloric theory and the Phlogiston theory of the past in 'Extreme Cold'. There reaches a point in any mathematical meandering that the abstractions they represent, begin to resemble more art than science. My job is to ensure that art does not get infected with the same diseases science is now exhibiting; as indicated by the symptoms already displayed by her theorist's and intellectuals. It has reached the point that anybody can say anything about everything. So why not me? Why not you? Here let's have fun; Let's construct a Universe that is thermodynamically sound because it's built like one gigantic HVAC system. Why should just theoretical physicists and theologians have all that fun and while were at it lets build lots of universes too!
We'll start with Entropy in terms of what is called Exergy which is also the first goal (man's goal) of Thermodynamics (to produce mechanical work), where thermodynamics can be used to, also, register 'Nothing' through the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics which is the only law of thermodynamics that can also produce mechanical energy and not just work, as already described in my other articles. Exergy is only important if you are an engineer because it is already fully covered by its opposite: 'Entropy', so there is no need for this term in physics and, as already described, there are many ways to create mechanical work and this is definitely not just a phenomena restricted to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. In fact there are so many ways to create mechanical work when we explore the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics, that if fully revealed, the toothpaste tube in this illustration would appear smaller than the toothpaste nozzle itself. So 'Exergy' is actually an intellectual ideal ultimately to be used for First of all, the difference between the Universe and any other system is that its heat entropy will never increase or decrease beyond -454.77 °F because the Universe is an indefinite open system and the only one too and so it cannot be affected by anything else, nor can it dissipate any of its energy into anything else, nor does energy deteriorate or get destroyed. It cannot be an isolated system because it emits energy which we see as the cosmic background, but if one were outside the Universe, we would not be aware of anything and if we could perceive it like we see other galaxies, then we are already part of it and so, not outside of it even though we might think we are because no one can travel faster than the Universe, to go outside of it. That's why it's called the Universe. Anyway, anyone can pick up the scent that there are things that go way beyond Relativity here, when discovering this realm.
Only closed systems deteriorate and suffer the effects of entropy and ultimately disappear but they are preserved as memory in all matter and energy because of the changes they produced had an effect relating to cause; therefor its future immortal existence owes itself to information, that becomes part of an entropy system. This means that all gods are dead people and any living person who wants to be a real god, must die first because "the arrow of time", which also kills, says so. Nothing less than death is acceptable concerning protocol in this matter. There are no living breathing gods and if they exist, they exist in a completely different system that is incompatible to ours because Time says so (notice that there is no more arrow). But those with the perspicacity to be able to carry on conversations and hold long audiences with such beings; or those that "know" such things do not exist, themselves, already exist in another realm that is beyond the Physical Universe of Nature and this realm is usually referred to as 'insanity'.
Here we will not discuss entropy in a closed system but in an open one, that is indefinite where the entropy never changes because if it did, the ambient temperature of the universe would steadily rise or fall overtime depending on what's going on, the properties of matter would change and so the laws of physics too, and things would start disappearing and appearing, as certain things do in certain magnitudes, like 'virtual particles, where entropy has no effect (even though it is still there). Open systems like the indefinite, I feel, has been severely misrepresented in Thermodynamics, in favour of the infinite and the definite and probable, possible and topological. Now theoretical physics is paying the price for this
Let's Explore Some Real, Fake Universes Before We Create Our Own and Maybe Find Some Good Ideas Along The Way.
If I am writing about something in geology, for instance, and I need a picture of a jewel and type "Jewel" in a search-engine query, I get this page (illustration) which to me, is unbelievable. She's is probably pretty because she has fangs and bad make-up which is probably appealing now to young people, with those who are interested in intimate matters concerning anything and with 12 year old girls who apparently rule the economy in matters concerning consumer consumption. So I used this page's query and focused on video to find out who she is and discovered she is just an other unremarkable country singer whose 15 minutes have long gone, a long time ago and now is back in her sarcophagus where she still rises up on occasion to suck. To finally get a picture of a jewel, I had to query "geology/gem". Increasingly, searches are being sent to those results that are representative of only people with those names of personalities/artists and less on any objective definitions or representations where if you scroll down the page, not one single geological gem is displayed for perusal for the word jewel. If the thing is not on a search page you can't link to it, so according to search, the word "jewel" as a gem doesn't exist. This is tolerable when you know what you are looking for and can, after some effort force the issue but if one is doing pure abstract research and does not know what qualities should come up, we may not be aware of the fact that these are fashionable results only to the words present usage. This is trickled down to the intelligence level of people who need pictures on a restaurant menu to order food. Imagine what these developers of the internet who are supposedly more intelligent and secure than most, what kind of mind they possess to allow such things or not even notice there might be a problem somewhere.
Even better; When I was looking for something fun like; "vintage picture of a screaming woman" which they had in horror B movies posters in the past, something like I have up above (third picture) because I had to redo my site from scratch.
I get, instead, a page full of pornographic pictures of woman fornicating and submitting to acts of fellatio upon ugly and disproportioned men with very neglected bodies, and there is no "love" being expressed there, with either party, — whatever that is sometimes. The woman are obviously very busy and so cannot be screaming. So, here we have a situation where search engines are catering to false imagery too, because you would have to imagine these woman as actually screaming in their minds where it is easy to imagine them hating themselves which I suppose a lot of men and women get off on this. Search parameters oddly extend also to a lot of men's morbid sexual fantasies and misogyny because their own sex does not get the same treatment in search engines, which I have verified when searching 'screaming men' and I don't see men performing fellatio, while on their knees to withered, fat and old festering men. Is the internet becoming a template of the collective human mind, and its own created frustration and inability to deal with its problems? If this is so, then every atrocity we see on the news should be no surprise.
Note: This has since been corrected since I published this article where I extend my compliments to Google because this is the kind of Big Brother stuff I like, where I just have to write something here, and the internet responds and I don't need Twitter or Facebook to do this and this is not the only instance I can cite. Of course I don't claim credit as the initiator of this correction, I'm only saying when I squawk, someone seems to be listening somewhere.
Unfortunately this does not solve the problem which shows that Google itself understands less about its own search engine or this is being done on purpose. If we type "Inline Images Abuse" we get an entire page of child abuse and here we can narrow down the problem. Search engines, increasingly, search verb, adverbs and motivations and not nouns, adjectives and subjects. This alters reality completely and renders meaning: Meaningless. This will entirely alienate everyone who lives in civilization in the future making everybody ripe for total exploitation.
My question is: Who or what creates these changes that affects any kind of universe? My conjecture would be mobile technology, itself, is primarily responsible for this, where mobile browsers are increasingly affecting the internet and search engine web crawler results because of the different ways people use their phones and leave comments or place queries on pages (which automatically updates the page) as compared to how people use their PC's, as these two thing have entirely different aspirations and are used quite differently and their pages are treated differently and their browser's are only adapted to superficial differences. The result is the dumbing down of search engines of what is to be considered important. It will also be interesting to see when anyone does something about this and before this happens, I see a new phenomenon making its appearance and it will appear as a virtual kind of "Crash" where a search engine will create search results to only subjective and existential things to anyone and will always produce the same results regardless of how the query is worded. It's when ordinary people, actually, start noticing this as weird and feel "victimized" as if they are force-fed only certain things not realizing that people, themselves, are the perpetrators of their own victimization. This will be interesting, in itself, because people will be inconvenienced by their own laziness and weaknesses and by their implications not by any applications and will attempt to blame others. Technology itself, will demonstrate things conclusively, that all thinkers in history, have failed to prove or justify, whether they be from the scientific side or the religious side and man's knowledge that he needs to survive, not titillate, will get lost in cyber space if he doesn't pay more attention. Strange Universe.
For now, this is our secret and let's keep this to ourselves so we can enjoy all the fun when it happens, when we start seeing endless debates and rounds of accusations, completely devoid of humanism and intelligence. Media theorist's and other "experts" will have a field day with this one and will undoubtedly turn this into a good business too, selling lots of books, making documentaries and make TED-like assertions at circuit-lecture tours and so on. There will be new professions of people who are highly payed, that will replace IT professionals, who can "crack" through "impenetrable" walls of pornography and mayhem, and leap over the tallest cathedrals of evangelical propaganda, in a single bound, to find what you are looking for, creating a new class of geek with its own language, code and unexplainable phenomena. This is an opinion that is based on many principles in thermodynamics and themselves do not provide a solution but indicate why/how this problem is created because of the different nature's and purpose's of these two technologies are increasingly diverging but affect only one cyberspace. The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics is very clear with this: Only man can fix his own problems and he is solely responsible entirely for his own systems.
Oh yes, I forgot we were building our own comfortable HVAC universe to tinker with. Forgive me. We'll call this: 'The universe were we forget and went off on different tangents because of search engines'. Fortunately, to 
The beauty of this system is, we are not disturbing the natural entropy of the Universe because it is only potential differences of different systems we are pumping out with our imaginary circulating pump. People want crackpots and angry gods, well, here's my circulating pump that will top anything, on one side with religion and on the other side, what science has to offer in an "easy-to-understand" system. What's better about my way, is that there is nothing wrong with using one's imagination and purposely create impossible situations for the fun of it. It's only when someone presents it as a finished product that things go awry. I'm doing the same thing that one of the world's greatest physicists Paul Dirac (the guy who theorized, back in 1933, the existence of anti-matter and told everyone this for the first time in a Nobel Prize speech of all places: "I'm guessing" and just applying a bit of imagination for colour and flavour. What's good enough for someone who was lot smarter, than me, is good enough for a stupid person like me. When I think about it, a guessing game is, often, a lot better than a theory or postulate and it has proven to be an important tool in speculation and in the theory creation, as Dirac did this all the time and this is where a lot of scientists get their reputations for weirdness. Science and art are the only places where free association, creating problems in thought experiments are useful tools in discovering the truth. The advantage of a guess is that you don't have to take it seriously and it is always something simple and invariably leads to something that is good when handled with a modicum of reason. Besides, it is my duty, as an artist, to sometimes fill the internet with well meaning junk, that at least attempts to get people to think before this part of the internet gets adsorbed by those forces that are attempting to stifle your knowledge, imagination, sense of wonder and creativity and replace everything with things that are cute and/or have firm privies. Ladies and Gentlemen please choose your weapons: The obtuse and arcane mathematical formula on strings from the egghead way up above, or my circulating pump, as the game shall commence very soon.
More seriously, why I introduced a circulating pump and a toothpaste tube, is for a review and because they can, effectively, demonstrate that fusion of hydrogen nuclei is not the only standard of free energy creation in any universe because if this were true, then the "Big Bang" definitely did not occur simply because there were no Atoms, of any kind, present, before and during this event but this is used as a standard "candle" nevertheless in any discussion on entropy and energy in the universe (Cosmic Background Radiation). Among other things, the reasoning being; is that you cannot split a Helium nucleus and converted it back to Hydrogen Nuclei because the mass needed to form a hydrogen nuclei has already been converted to energy. There is a big difference between a hydrogen ion nuclei that has been turned into a proton because of heat and pressure and a proton that been released into space despite what you read everywhere where everybody says there is no difference between a proton and a hydrogen positive ion, and that difference is mass.
These protons released into space and travel the solar winds do not turn into a hydrogen atoms if they encounter electrons along the way for other reasons I won't get into here, but take the heat and pressure away from the protons in the suns core formerly known as hydrogen nuclei, they become hydrogen atoms again which we see when stars die because they release a lot of hydrogen gas that were formerly protons that never got fused to become other elements (below). Protons interact with the Earth's magnetic field along with independent electrons and positrons which we see as the 'Aurora Borealis' and 'Aurora Australis'. A proton is a composite particle. It takes six hydrogen nuclei protons to create one helium atom which have two protons and two neutrons.
The extra two protons it took to make helium, like catalysts, in the proton-proton cycle of a solar mass are busy doing other things (like waiting their turn to do the fusion process elsewhere and the protons used to make the helium are now missing some mass; therefore, these protons in the helium ash can never be used to make hydrogen nuclei ever again, yet they are protons just like the squeezed toothpaste tube example up above, is still a toothpaste tube except that it is a bit "used" or "entropied". A helium atom is only 99.29% as massive as four hydrogen atoms and the missing mass has been turned into sunshine and the missing toothpaste in the tube went to create brighter teeth, — both of which are brand new realities which is what all mass to energy conversion is all about, — the creation of reality. It's Nature's bookkeeping system at these magnitudes to prevent things from going back like they do in the quantum; which has another bookkeeping system. After this, depending on a stars mass and temperature there is a plethora of mass conversions of different kinds too numerous to mention here that create energy and systems but the most important are the Proton-Proton Cycle and the Carbon–Nitrogen–Oxygen Cycle. Please read or bookmark this article in Wikipedia with excellent links: Stellar Evolution.
This same loss-of-mass in protons including those changes in associated particles; i.e. Electron Capture, with fusion, continues all the way until iron is created. For stars a little bigger than ours there is a slight problem when iron is created, the net output of energy in fusion involving iron is less than the energy required to perform this act just like if one were to use a form of fission to extract hydrogen nuclei from helium, the energy required to do so, would be more than the energy gained. The star is called upon to pay back every last bit of energy it had given away munificently from its beginning. The star cannot do this so it goes "bankrupt" and collapses (implodes) violently. So much gravitational, potential and kinetic energy is released in that one instant of deflation that all the expensive elements that exist after iron, like gold, silver, platinum etc. are created, then and there; the star explodes. The following little snippet of video made by NASA (1:30), shows how this happens with a simple tennis and ping pong ball: Supernova Ball Bounce This video also shows how NASA is trying to save money. The special atmospheric conditions of outer space that are represented in this video, that allow us to "hear" the supernova explosion, in real-time as if it were 29 feet away, were provided by the well-meaning.
The only way to create a brand new proton that could form deuterium naturally, in this universe, is with the radioactive decay of a neutron, which they all do readily, once a neutron is free from the nucleus of any atom. Its lifetime in this universe is about 15 minutes and decays into a proton which some can then become any isotope of hydrogen with another proton which a split helium atom could not do. This radioactive decay (the weak force) is rare in a star but is important in the fusion process that involves creating many new elements that would not normally be created with regular fusion processes, provided that the stellar mass already has the seeds of some heavier elements in its core. Its outline is not to specifically create new hydrogen ions but is part of the process in the creation of many heavier elements. With protons freed from any other element besides hydrogen, we would need to learn how to turn energy back into mass, using extreme temperatures and pressure/acceleration. The process would be similar to making the toothpaste tube as if no one ever touched it and it was something brand new, from-the-box again but far less extreme because we don't require that much pressure/acceleration and temperature to make a toothpaste tube new but the principle is the same. This is another method besides supernovae to produce new elements which any star of any size can do.
Closing scene from The Fly (1958)
Yet theoretical and particle theorists and their intellectual counterparts think of fantastic things like "Reverse Entropy Machines" or a Time Machines and weird forms of faster-than-light travel, etc. where simple nuclear physics (not quantum physics because we're not there yet) is not even considered, where it is clear to anybody that the demarcation of any kind of control with any kind of closed system ends in the realm of nuclear physics which is still in the realm of classical mechanics on the threshold of quantum mechanics, when armed with a superficial knowledge of The nuclear weak force which if you peruse the contents of this link you just past, you'll see in its history that there is a lot of radical tampering going on here, but thank the stars that we have Beta decay which is the only thing they can't play around with because Beta decay renders any kind of speculation by intellectual theorists redundant and its very easy for anybody to learn and understand.
These people share the same personality types as those 17 - 19th century individuals who believed that you can create and destroy energy and matter and think that the universe was entirely and exclusively created for the rich man's benefit only, which is why they're so appealing to ordinary people who are, incidentally, oppressed by these same individuals. The universe they create for everybody is one big nuclear reactor, and is constructed out of the idea that to get people to accept ownership and control of anything on their part, they tell everybody that they too can own anything and then call this "democracy" and "free enterprise" when, in fact, it is totalitarianism and private enterprise, — Well people will believe anything. The idea for them, is to own and control the biggest and most important portions where the end justifies the means to do this. So the rest think they are happy because they can own something too, but everything that is leftover for the little people to own and control are things that have extremely high entropy which require a lot of energy, effort, time and work from outside resources to maintain; which by sheer coincidence those outside resources are owned and controlled by the big people. Huge corporate high rises do not deteriorate; they depreciate if left idle or not. Individual homes gain value but they deteriorate if left idle on not. Each system has its own balance but the big owners get a form of balance that they benefit from with depreciation which small owners don't get the same benefits in by deterioration meaning that you cannot declare on your income tax that the house has lost value because of neglect and claim a credit for that loss but corporations can get credits for the buildings depreciation which is completely an illusion and exists because people are naïve enough to allow this or, themselves, want to actively participate in this nightmare called: 'King of the Mountain'. Both parties can claim deductions for expenses in maintenance and repairs but small owners are taxed for any capital gains as if their small holdings were a major conglomerate. This system keeps the poor poor and turns the middle class against other by the use of leverage and credit, and the rich laugh all the to the bank and they keep smiling when they leave the bank and hop on a plane, to another destination, to create even more mayhem. Another Strange Universe.
The little owners provide all the money, effort, planning, time, work and energy and the big owners provide the high priced shoddy materials and polluting energy that, by design, runs only antiquated engines and systems, that cost them nothing to make or produce, in exchange, to do the work necessary to maintain the little peoples high-entropy properties and their own depreciating buildings. Only the big people own all the nice Boardwalk and Park Place-like systems and they are all the type of ownership's that are self-sustaining systems with no entropy whatsoever that don't require outside resources to generate revenue or mayhem, which is called 'deprecation'. This is like when some children steal something nice or do something bad and they are caught by another peer who is about to report the incident, where then they petition this peer not to tell anybody and, in exchange, show them how they too can steal and acquire their own stuff and even provide information as to where and how to find their own goodies and how to obtain them but making sure they only know enough to satisfy their own small needs which will have to be maintained somehow, in some way, which of course this service will be provided, for a price, by the Alpha thief.
Originally from Stevio...LA, February 22, 2011 Fair Use
The First Law of Thermodynamics can only have significance if the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics comes before it and it becomes a perversion of science and philosophy without the Zeroth Law.
Beings that would be tele-transported or time-transported would believe that they are in the same universe but, in fact, would not be because these things are not allowed in system's interactions so illusions are created because each system resembles the same when your inside them, It is only the greater system's possibilities that become more evident. The First Law of Thermodynamics defines what an isolated system is capable of, so anything that would escape it would be part of a closed or open system (depending on what's outside it) but one can never go back to the isolated system ever again and would need to create a new one instead (which would, in any case, be different). Even quantum entanglement does not allow systems to exchange energy or information in two directions because then everything would be an an open system but since systems do exist and quantum mechanics will function in any of these systems, but quantum mechanics will not function between different systems simultaneously meaning that: The particle inside an isolated system can also be simultaneously outside the isolated system but the particle that is outside cannot also be inside the isolated system because of the increase in probabilities it has newly acquired would not allow the particle to go back because it would lose those probabilities in the isolated system. Energy, particles and people like acquiring things and won't give up these acquired things easily. If this did not happen a butane can (an isolated system) would accumulate more probabilities until it explodes all by itself and abrogate the First Law of thermodynamics among other things. If one focuses on exergy, the results of any communication with any special relationship between one system and any other system, those systems are always preserved and it is the communication or transfer of information that get distorted and Nature will go to great lengths to preserve Its various systems. This means there are limits to any intellectual, political or economist fanciful ideal, and this can be calculated and documented into mathematical proofs.
In English, this means that systems created by people like Donald Trump, by the way they use systems, at one point, themselves get fired. Maybe not in their own lifetimes but eventually overtime their organizations will disappear and be replaced and they will be forgotten. These are the sorts where the expression, "15 minutes of fame applies". In entropy, what appears as disorder and chaos can only be to a closed system as there is no such increase of entropy in open systems because they can furnish any kind of equilibrium with anything because there is more space and more probabilities that appear out of nowhere to do this. The choice for any human being is to understand those differences and at least make an effort to apply his/her life more to an open-system relationship while freeing themselves from those that are not open. By incorporating and applying more and more open systems in the person's life, they would be ultimately be protected from the quirks and imperfections of any closed systems and can move on and exist beyond them. The indefinite systems can be used as a spiritual inlet/outlet that must function in a conserved manner with respect to all other systems that it communicates or interacts with, but these indefinite systems are really for more evolved beings elsewhere on another planets or dimensions. For us primitive beings it is better to treat the indefinite with some respect and care but never with awe. For us it is sufficient to simply know that it exists because, at present, this is beyond anyone's comprehension and spirituality and playing around with this will get you fired. To get an idea of what I mean; ask yourself a rhetorical question: What is it you are feeling right now after reading this? Ask yourself if those things you described are actual feelings because feeling good, fine or bad are not feelings. They actually serve as stock phrases to dismiss people in the guise of being polite.
I'm not saying that people are bad or stupid, I'm saying that any society, or member of society, that needs to explain the meaning of life or the Universe already has problems because if the society was so right or good then such questions would not be asked in the first place because people are already looking to escape by asking those type of questions. I'm definitely saying that we should work to find ways to enjoy life than ask stupid question that can never be answered correctly, because the Universe and life are beyond 'Correctness' and discussing these things in those terms reduces life and the Universe (and ultimately your own life) because you can't actually put fences or boxes around existence and inversely, there are always unexpected surprises in things that are put in boxes and fences, in all kinds of different ways, that science, religion and regular philosophy have never even considered, yet the simplest person understands this immediately.
When I see a religious person in ecstasy or rapture, and who is not having sex, I know he is in his own universe and nirvana, and cannot relate anything to any reality in any way and so should not be taken seriously. The same goes for theorists and intellectuals who go around and change the meaning of 2 + 2 to fit their ideas rather than understand the Universe and the nature of any form of existence, except in their case they are in desperate need of relief from some form of tension to come out with this kind of crap. This includes people's and all animal's intrinsic needs and let's not forget the requirements set down by all inanimate things too and just because they are not alive does not mean that they don't have needs and requirements to maintain their properties where matter once again becomes peaceful and passive, which is the definition of inertia, according to Natural Philosophy, which cannot be contradicted by modern science and its methods.
On the speculation - of - the - beginnings - of - the -cosmos front, the only way for a "Big Bang" to of occurred is, if gravity decided to stop for an instant inside a quantum singularity, which incidentally is actually supposed to be the size of a turnip as seen in the illustration above. The details of this supposition have been revised an infinite number of times since they created this nonsense which means this idea is still trying to find an equivalence to some reality somewhere. This proves that what man cannot or won't do, Nature will do. So forget Fusion as the only source of energy and entropy, in our "creation" story.
The Entropy of the energy released from pre-atomic mass of a cataclysmic event has not been I'm sure a quark, if it could talk, could describe something it would call: "The Big Burst" in its magnitude and time as could whatever makes up, or is responsible, for the existence of a quark. One thing we do do know for sure, is before there were protons there were liquids, gases, and plasma but no solids have been discovered, so far, except for the quark particles themselves (which doesn't count) and quarks are also known as the "Perfect Liquid". There being liquids, then molecular organization and activity is possible with quarks. (see: Extreme Cold part 1) The question is: What states of matter are possible with things that are even smaller than quarks? In the end it takes an indefinite number of things to create mere protons and electrons, so this means the universe is not ready-made by any god or
Note: I personally do not care one way or another about belief systems, organized religions, philosophers and intellectuals except that they are the largest purveyors of BS in the universe so it is "solely" out of this context I criticize the concept of god and other related things, which no one is privileged to have a special relationship with under any circumstances, and certainly no one has any authority to speak about such things unless you give them that authority. I do not. I have never known a skeptic to go insane. Only people that "believe" in anything besides logic and equilibrium, I have seen victim to insanity and further they believe that they believe. These sorts have taken upon themselves to decide what is good and bad for all humanity and all things forever, in a multitude of scenarios. That has yet to be proven and someone telling me a story isn't good enough proof. To me just talking about anything makes it exist which should be sufficient for anything in this Universe, including gods, and grovelling or any form of adulation towards anything is not required if we use Nature as a template in how to conduct oneself.
This thing called cosmology, is worse than organized religion because it suggests that gravity and Thermodynamics did not exist prior the "the Big Bang" and further everything else appeared miraculously out of nowhere or organized itself ahead of its time and stayed there too for some reason. Sound to me like they are differing the "problem of existence" (which is not a problem) to religion instead of being more objective. These ideas abrogate the 'Steady state theory' yet unwittingly reinforce it in other areas which are an embarrassment, so they focus our attention in the things they want us to look at like an illusionist who uses misdirection to focus his audience where he wants them to look.
These intellectuals might be smarter than me but I'm faster than them, and you will see that I just keep my arguments coming non-stop, like a Maxim gun, because I have a distinct advantage of using rhetoric Thermodynamically as if it were a philosophy. Guess what? Thermodynamics works well that way too especially when no one, anywhere, can be trusted and am thankful that I know Nature will never lie to me, nor is there even going to be a contest involved when dealing with It — ever, and Nature doesn't need middlemen or spokespeople to tell me anything I need to know. Information, all by itself seems to find a way to go where it is most needed, anywhere in the Universe, instantly, and I show many examples of this in all my articles and essays. Nature has given me eyes and ears, sensitivity and instinct to help me understand a Universe that is broadcasting Its presence and reality 24 hours a day where if I lose my way, I need not go back too far, or wait long either, to find reality again.
Reality has been given a bum rap over things we cannot see and this is the work of the cognoscenti. I ask: What other senses do you want Nature to give you, to see more proof of reality, when most people have lost the ability to use the ones they already have and their judgment becomes clouded even further with poisoned food, sound and air and perpetually living in artificial environments, ruled by clocks and serving the alien needs of others within various fabricated existences in which not one contains any philosophy of hope, peace or even love and all governed by the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics?
The only things we know are things that appear out of nowhere and disappear into nowhere immediately. But for us, this was suspended for our benefit as if the universe was a television set where a god is watching its favourite show with its remote control handy while we desperately try to prevent him from changing the channel by keeping him amused in the same way Madame Pompadour kept the French king, suffering from incurable ennui, amused 24 hours a day. My understanding of science is that, it is supposed to dispel religious thinking because religion actually goes nowhere and exists only as a cycle in a closed or isolated system and it cannot evolve but can only diverge like any kind of exoskeleton species.
Instead, these theories by cosmologists and theoretical/particle physicists amplify religious thinking by filling up the missing ideas, that are not in any religious literature, with new stuff, like Clerk Maxwell did, and these guys act like prophets too. In the future, foolish people will be singing the praises of the Prophets Maxwell and Hawking instead of Abraham and less foolish ones will be singing the Praises of the Prophets Faraday and Einstein but it is still more believing that is happening than thinking which is what people like Faraday and Einstein want you to do. For instance: It is far more important to work and play with 'Relativity' or 'Electromagnetic Field Theory' than actually "understand" these things because depending how and where your imagination goes and what you think they might be good for, these things inevitably become beautiful new things in themselves that have nothing to do with Maxwell's Wave Theory or Hawking's determinist ideas or equations.
The ancient Prophets and pharisees were no more that the Krausses, Susskinds, Hawkings and Sagans, etc. etc. of their time. In reality if they can't find a physical connection between the soul and the physical reality, then it doesn't exist, except as an invention of the mind that is overflowing with existentialisms to make up for many inconsistencies as there's nothing like some emotion to make things "feel" real instead of the actual real. I discuss death in my following articles (I link my articles together) and "my findings indicate" something far more interesting and beautiful when it's handled by Nature not a god. Finally, for a god to actually exist, it can have no part of any physical universe and there is no if, ands or buts about this because there is simply no possible tangible connection that is possible and human beings do not have a special interface to bridge anything between any kind of different universes. So no one can connect to heaven or hell under any circumstances nor can these supernaturals communicate here in anyway despite their magic. All good and evil, here, is all home grown good and evil which is a good thing because there is no external agency providing us with this, which if there was, we would not be able to control it so we can only blame ourselves for our own problems. Too many fill up their lives and mind with things that don't exist instead of real things that you can see and touch that limit growth by claiming to be the truth or a higher truth, where they fall prey to priests and intellectuals. Eventually, we can get rid of both, good and evil, because, one day, someone will discover that we don't need to prove ourselves to anybody, anyway, anywhere or submit into obedience for anything. Humanity by itself is good, provided it is not interfered with and given the tools and information to think for itself, ᾰ otherwise we are just cattle.
gpdb
Go to Top of Page
This Page was last updated:
6:20 AM 2/8/2013
11:37 AM 1/17/2013
8:14 AM 11/12/2012
6:42 AM 8/28/2012
9:06 PM 7/31/2012
